Who are we?


Signup for

Online registration

Log in to register
your trial

Search a trial




van CCT (UK)

van CCT (UK)

Preventieve armpositionering en elektrostimulatie bij CVA-patiŽnten.

- candidate number5564
- NTR NumberNTR1748
- ISRCTNISRCTN wordt niet meer aangevraagd
- Date ISRCTN created
- date ISRCTN requested
- Date Registered NTR7-apr-2009
- Secondary IDs2008.107 / ABR no. 22402.042.08 Medical Ethical Committee University Medical Center Groningen / CCMO
- Public TitlePreventieve armpositionering en elektrostimulatie bij CVA-patiŽnten.
- Scientific TitlePositioning And Electrical Stimulation In Stroke.
- hypothesisN/A
- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studiedStroke
- Inclusion criteria1. A first ever or recurrent stroke except subarachnoid hemorrhages;
2. Age above 18;
3. Between 2 and 8 weeks post-stroke;
4. An apparent paralysis / severe paresis of the involved upper limb.
- Exclusion criteria1. Any of the following contra indications for electrical stimulation:
A. Metal implants in the involved arm or shoulder;
B. Cardiac pacemaker;
C. Thrombosis;
D. (Thrombo)phlebitis;
E. Cancerous lesions;
F. Skin infections on forearm or shoulder blade;
G. Epileptic seizures six months previous to and since the stroke;
H. Pregnancy and myasthenia gravis/myotonia.
2. Pre-existent impairments of the affected arm (e.g. peripheral neuropathy, frozen shoulder);
3. The ability to make selective movements of the hemiplegic arm (more than 18 points on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment arm score);
4. Severe cognitive deficits and/or severe language comprehension difficulties (more than one of four questions wrong on the verbal items of the AbilityQ).
- mec approval receivedyes
- multicenter trialyes
- randomisedyes
- masking/blindingSingle
- controlPlacebo
- groupParallel
- Type2 or more arms, randomized
- Studytypeintervention
- planned startdate 11-aug-2008
- planned closingdate31-dec-2010
- Target number of participants38
- InterventionsThe experimental group receives a standardised therapeutic procedure for the hemiplegic arm and simultaneous therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) with a motor response (i.e. joint movement is elicited) of the external rotators of the shoulder and extensors of the forearm twice a day for 45 minutes on working days.
The control group receives a (sham) positioning procedure at half the available shoulder range of motion and simultaneous conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with a sensory response only (i.e. no movement is elicited) of the extensors of the forearm twice a day for 45 minutes on working days.
- Primary outcome1. Passive range of motion (PROM) of seven different arm movements will be assessed using a using a masked hydrogoniometer;
2. Shoulder pain will be assessed using the ShoulderQ.
- Secondary outcome1. The degree of difficulty the patient and his/her primary carer have with activities related to the hemiplegic (spastic) arm is assessed with the Leeds Arm Spasticity Impact Scale (LASIS);
2. Arm spasticity will be assessed using the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS);
3. The 66-point arm section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) will be used to assess the ability to make selective movements of the hemiplegic arm;
4. The degree of shoulder inferior subluxation is clinically graded in (half) fingerbreadths palpable below the acromion process in both shoulders.
- TimepointsMeasurements will be made at baseline, after 4 weeks (intermediate), after 8 weeks (outcome) and after 20 weeks (follow-up).
- Trial web
- statusinclusion stopped: follow-up
- Sponsor/Initiator University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Funding
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
- PublicationsN/A
- Brief summaryEach year more than 41.000 people are struck by a stroke in the Netherlands. In more than 60% of the cases the hemiplegic arm remains without function. Disuse of the arm makes it prone to the occurrence of contracture formation and spasticity. This results in hemiplegic shoulder pain, motor impairments and activity limitations (e.g. cleaning the arm, dressing). Available evidence based single-modality treatments are not suitable for patients with poor motor performance, and severely affected patients are underrepresented in the research literature. Positioning procedures and electrical stimulation both seem best suitable for severely affected stroke patients and combining these treatment modalities may even be more efficacious. We hypothesize that the electrical stimulation intensifies the effect of the positioning procedure, resulting in slowing down of contracture formation, less hemiplegic shoulder pain, less restrictions in the stroke patientís performance of activities of daily life, decreased levels of spasticity and prevention of subluxation.
- Main changes (audit trail)
- RECORD7-apr-2009 - 17-jun-2010

  • Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar