|- candidate number||1404|
|- NTR Number||NTR229|
|- Date ISRCTN created||20-dec-2005|
|- date ISRCTN requested||18-okt-2005|
|- Date Registered NTR||6-sep-2005|
|- Secondary IDs||N/A |
|- Public Title||Influence of intravenous versus oral administration, arterial versus venous sampling and gender on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide-induced pain relief in healthy volunteers.|
|- Scientific Title||Influence of intravenous versus oral administration, arterial versus venous sampling and gender on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide-induced. |
|- hypothesis||This study is designed to get a full PK/PD characteristic of the opioid analgesic morphine and its active metabolite M6G after oral and iv infusion and to test wether sex differences exist in the analgesic behaviour of both opioids.|
|- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied||Post-operative pain|
|- Inclusion criteria||1. Healthy volunteers;|
2. Aged 18+.
|- Exclusion criteria||1. BMI>30;|
2. Pregrancy or lactation;
3. Presence of medical disease;
4. Presence of psychiatric disease;
5. Allergy to study medication;
6. History of drugs or alcohol abuse.
|- mec approval received||yes|
|- multicenter trial||no|
|- Type||2 or more arms, randomized|
|- planned startdate ||1-nov-2005|
|- planned closingdate||1-nov-2006|
|- Target number of participants||60|
|- Interventions||Drug administration (blinded): morphine or M6G.|
|- Primary outcome||Pain relief related parameters (VAS to heat pain) in males vs females.|
|- Secondary outcome||PK parameters.
|- Trial web site||N/A|
|- status||inclusion stopped: follow-up|
|- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIES||Prof. Dr. Albert Dahan|
|- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIES||Prof. Dr. Albert Dahan|
|- Sponsor/Initiator ||Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)|
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
|CeNes Ltd, Cambridge UK |
|- Brief summary||Morphine is a potent opioid used for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. |
After morphine infusion a small part (6 to 10%) is metabolized to the active component morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). Both morphine and M6G act at the mu-opioid receptor causing analgesia and side effects, such as respiratory depression, sedation, itching, orthostatic hypotension, blurred vision, delayed gastric emptying, etc.
Recent studies indicate, however, that the side effect profiles of different opioids differ significantly.
For example, our own studies indicate that M6G displays favorable pharmacodynamics over morphine with respect to respiratory depression. It is therefore to be expected that M6G will be available for the treatment of acute postoperative and chronic cancer pain in the near future (M6G is currently undergoing phase III studies).
Intravenous versus oral administration:
In previous studies we assessed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous morphine and M6G.
This resulted is reliable pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models which may be used to predict morphine and M6G concentrations and pain relief after an intravenous infusion.
While for treatment of acute pain opioids are predominantly administered via the intravenous route, chronic and cancer pain treatment is often performed via non-intravenous routes, e.g., sublingual, rectal, transcutaneous and oral routes.
Good PK/PD models of these non-iv routes are currently not available. Furthermore it may be argued that M6G will undergo de-glucuronization in the gut and hence its bio-availability may be reduced after oral administration.
This would profoundly increase clinically relevant doses of M6G, and restrict its clinical utility while concomitantly increasing its side-effect liability.
Previously we observed important sex differences in the pharmacodynamics of morphine with greater morphine potency in women.
The end-point of that study was pain tolerance to an electrical noxious stimulus. Interestingly, no sex differences in M6G's analgesic potency were observed in later studies. However, opioid analgesic efficacy/potency has been demonstrated t be pain modality specific.
Thus, we remain uninformed whether the observed sex differences in morphine's analgesic properties were related to the pain modality measured or can be generalized to other pain modalties.
Arterial versus venous sampling:
In previous studies we determined arterial blood concentrations of morphine and M6G after intravenous infusions of these opioids and linked the measured concentrations to the pharmacodynamic end-point (electrical pain relief) using standard PK/PD modeling techniques.
We prefer arterial blood samples over venous samples. However, it may be argued –taken into account the elimination half-life of these drugs- that similar results may be obtained when using venous samples, assuming that a rapid equilibration between venous and arterial blood is obtained. Since there are currently no studies exploring the effect of arterial versus venous sampling on the kinetics and dynamics of morphine and M6G, there are currently no data to substantiate either position.
|- Main changes (audit trail)|
|- RECORD||6-sep-2005 - 9-sep-2009|