search  
 


Home

Who are we?

Why
register?


Signup for
registration


Online registration

Log in to register
your trial


Search a trial

NRT en CCMO

Contact

NEDERLANDS





MetaRegister
van CCT (UK)


ISRCTN-Register
van CCT (UK)


Urological complications after live donor kidney transplantation: Intravesical or extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis?


- candidate number8051
- NTR NumberNTR2320
- ISRCTNISRCTN wordt niet meer aangevraagd.
- Date ISRCTN created
- date ISRCTN requested
- Date Registered NTR10-mei-2010
- Secondary IDsMEC-2009-385 METC Erasmus MC
- Public TitleUrological complications after live donor kidney transplantation: Intravesical or extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis?
- Scientific TitleUrological complications after live donor kidney transplantation: Intravesical or extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis?
- ACRONYMINEX-trial
- hypothesisOur hypothesis is that the extravesical technique reduces the incidence of PCN placement, and urological complications.
- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studiedRenal transplant , Renal disease, Live kidney donors
- Inclusion criteriaAll kidney transplant recipients from a living donor, who are medically able to receive a kidney, can participate.
- Exclusion criteria1. Recipients younger than 18 years;
2. Donor kidneys with more than one ureter.
- mec approval receivedyes
- multicenter trialno
- randomisedyes
- masking/blindingDouble
- controlActive
- groupParallel
- Type2 or more arms, randomized
- Studytypeintervention
- planned startdate 1-jun-2010
- planned closingdate1-jun-2012
- Target number of participants200
- Interventions1. Intervention: Extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis technique;
2. Control: Intravesical ureterovesical anastomosis technique.
- Primary outcomeNumber of PCN placements by use of the extravesical ureterovesicostomy.
- Secondary outcome1. Number of re-operations and re-interventions for urological complications;
2. Operation time;
3. Costs.
- TimepointsFollow-up will be 1 year.
- Trial web siteN/A
- statusinclusion stopped: follow-up
- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIESMD. I.K.B. Slagt
- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIESDr. T. Terkivatan
- Sponsor/Initiator Erasmus Medical Center
- Funding
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
Mrace Comittee, Erasmus MC
- PublicationsN/A
- Brief summaryUrological complications after renal transplantation cause significant patient morbidity and may result in transplant failure. The majority of urological complications is related to the ureterovesical anastomosis and occurs within 3 months after transplantation.
Successful formation of the ureterovesical anastomosis is important in preventing complications and securing a functional transplant. Several techniques for ureterovesical anastomosis are described, with variable outcome. The surgical protocol for transplant ureteroneocystostomy has oscillated between intravesical and extravesical procedures. No technique has been convincingly proven to be superior to the other, although some studies suggest the superiority of the extravesical technique. In our center the standard technique is the intravesical technique. In case an urological complication (e.g. ureteral stenosis) occurs after transplantation, we might decide to place a percutaneous nephrostomy catheter (PCN). PCN can therefore been seen as a measure for the urological complications.
The aim of this study is to assess the rate of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement for urological complications in patients with an intra and extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis in live kidney transplantation, in order to determine which anastomosis technique has the least urological complications.
- Main changes (audit trail)
- RECORD10-mei-2010 - 10-mrt-2013


  • Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar nederlands@trialregister.nl