search  
 


Home

Who are we?

Why
register?


Signup for
registration


Online registration

Log in to register
your trial


Search a trial

NRT en CCMO

Contact

NEDERLANDS





MetaRegister
van CCT (UK)


ISRCTN-Register
van CCT (UK)


Effect of Routine Process Monitoring using the ORS / SRS scales on the outcome of treatment by a Rapid Response Team in MHC.


- candidate number9210
- NTR NumberNTR2796
- ISRCTNISRCTN wordt niet meer aangevraagd.
- Date ISRCTN created
- date ISRCTN requested
- Date Registered NTR7-mrt-2011
- Secondary IDsNL32944.097.10 METIGG
- Public TitleEffect of Routine Process Monitoring using the ORS / SRS scales on the outcome of treatment by a Rapid Response Team in MHC.
- Scientific TitleEffect of Routine Process Monitoring using the ORS / SRS scales on the outcome of treatment by a Rapid Response Team in MHC
- ACRONYM
- hypothesis1. Currently, there are a wide variety of therapeutic techniques for specific patients and certain psychological problems. The guidelines on mental health care focus only on the specific therapy factors. In addition to these specific therapy factors also exist universal or non-specific therapy factors. These factors are a good match between therapist and patient, a good therapeutic relationship and hope and expectation of improving both the therapist and the patient Both universal and specific factors influence the effectiveness of treatment. Routine Process Monitoring as appointed by Hafkenscheid (2008) is a systematic method in which feedback is given to the clinician on both the progress of the client and the quality of treatment. This would optimize the effectiveness;
2. Nowadays mental health care often has waiting lists most often for psychological and psychotherapeutic treatments. When the waiting time is longer than 4 weeks it might help to offer those patients some supportive treatment. They will get 5 supportive treatment sessions offered by a Social Psychiatric Nurse (SPV) in order to bridge the waiting time. The primary research question of this study is whether the effectiveness of the supportive treatment can be increased by the use of RPM. Secondary research question is to what extent the offering of 5 supportive treatment sessions generally improves the wellbeing of a patient. The study will take place at Dimence, location Steenwijk, Adult Division. These are secondary care;
3. Goal Knowledge:
A. Increase knowledge of Routine Process Monitoring as appointed by Hafkenscheid (2008) on whether or not systematic feedback to supportive treatment leads to increased effectiveness of therapy;
B. Increase knowledge to what extent the offering of 5 supportive treatment sessions generally improves the functioning of a patient Utilization: Patients, health insurers and mental health institutions benefit by optimizing the effectiveness of mental health care. Patients could benefit by customizing their treatment. Health insurers benefit as a high efficiency level leads to increased cost. Metal health institutions benefit by optimizing their treatment.
- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studiedPsychological Intervention, Waitinglist, Second line care
- Inclusion criteriaAmbulatory adult clients with indication for psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment in which the waiting time is greater than 4 weeks before treatment can start.
- Exclusion criteria1. Clients with no indication for psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment;
2. Clients with indication for psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment that can tolerate no delay.
- mec approval receivedyes
- multicenter trialno
- randomisedyes
- masking/blindingNone
- controlActive
- groupParallel
- Type2 or more arms, randomized
- Studytypeintervention
- planned startdate 15-mrt-2011
- planned closingdate15-mrt-2012
- Target number of participants120
- InterventionsAll patients who are in treatment by Dimence Steenwijk Section adults fill in the Outcome questionnaire (OQ-45) before intake. After the intake, patients are discussed in the team and those with an indication for psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment are put on a waiting list. Those patients who must wait for 4 weeks ore more before psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment can start, will be asked whether they wish to participate in the study. Within the study, all patients on a waiting list for a psychology or psychotherapy are at random divided into three groups:
1. A waiting list group;
2. A waiting list group where each individual patient gets 5 supportive treatment sessions from a social psychiatric nurse;
3. A waiting list group where each individual patient gets 5 supportive treatment sessions from a social psychiatric nurse and is asked for feedback by the routine process monitoring method.
After about six weeks anyone who will participate in the study will again be asked to fill in the OQ-45.
- Primary outcomeIs there a significant difference in treatment outcome if the RPM method is added to 5 supportive treatment sessions from a social psychiatric nurse?
- Secondary outcomeIs there a significant difference in overall functioning for patients who get 5 supportive treatment sessions from a social psychiatric nurse in comparison with patients on the waiting list?
- TimepointsBefore the intake and after 6 weeks.
- Trial web siteN/A
- statusplanned
- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIESDrs. A.M. Bovendeerd
- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIESDrs. A.M. Bovendeerd
- Sponsor/Initiator Dimence
- Funding
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
Dimence
- PublicationsN/A
- Brief summaryN/A
- Main changes (audit trail)
- RECORD7-mrt-2011 - 16-mrt-2011


  • Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar nederlands@trialregister.nl