|- candidate number||15121|
|- NTR Number||NTR4070|
|- ISRCTN||ISRCTN wordt niet meer aangevraagd.|
|- Date ISRCTN created|
|- date ISRCTN requested|
|- Date Registered NTR||12-jul-2013|
|- Secondary IDs||NL38767.068.11 |
|- Public Title||Preoperative evaluation of bleeding risk during surgery|
|- Scientific Title||Verification of preoperative screening for bleeding tendency and per-operative risk management (diagnostic study)|
|- ACRONYM||PANE (policlinic anaesthesiology, patients are recruited from here)|
|- hypothesis||Patients that report bleeding symptoms on the preoperative questionnaire that anaesthesiologists use, might have an undiagnosed bleeding disorder and/or more peroperative blood loss than patients that do not report bleeding symptoms. Whether diagnostic tests or an elaborate bleeding questionnaire is necessary in these patients to diagnose a bleeding disorder is unknown. In this study we include these patients, perform hemostatic tests, use the ISTH-Bleeding Assessment Tool and monitor per and post operative blood loss, use of blood products and mortality. Ultimateley, we want to design an easy-to-use screening algorithm for anaesthesiologists, that can detect patients at risk of per operative bleeding, so that preoperative measures can be taken to minimise blood loss, use of blood products and ultimately morbidity and mortality.|
|- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied||Perioperative blood loss , Undiagnosed bleeding disorders|
|- Inclusion criteria||- Adult subjects (at least 18 years of age) with planned elective surgery in:|
o Orthopedic surgery
o Gynecologic surgery
o General surgery
o Vascular surgery
o Oral and maxillofacial surgery
o Urologic surgery
o Ear nose and throat surgery
o Trauma surgery
- Subject has marked at least one of the following questions positively (adapted from preoperative screening list):
35. Heeft u last (gehad) van:
- Lang nabloeden na trekken van tanden/kiezen of na operatie of bevalling?
(Did you suffer from (abnormally long) bleeding after pulling of theeth/molars, after surgery or after delivery?)
- spontane tandvleesbloedingen?
(spontaneous gum bleeds?)
- spontane grote blauwe plekken?
(spontaneous large hematomas?)
- spontane neusbloedingen?
- nabloeden bij kleine wondjes (b.v. na het scheren)?
(bleeding after small wounds (for instance after shaving)?)
- Hevig bloedverlies tijdens de menstruatie?
(Severe blood loss during menstruation?)
- Zijn er bij familieleden problemen met de bloedstolling? (Anders dan door het gebruik van bloedverdunnende medicatie)
(Do you have any family relatives with blood clotting problems? (Not due to blood thinning medication))
|- Exclusion criteria||- Incapacitated subjects|
- Patients < 18 years of age
- Subjects referred to the hematology department preoperatively for consultation
- Positive answer on one of the following questions from the preoperative screening list
38. Heeft u hemofilie, de ziekte Von Willebrand of andere bloedstollingziekte? Zo ja, welke?
(Do you have haemophilia, Von Willebrand disease or another blood clotting disease? If so, which?)
- Use of thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors, NSAIDís or anticoagulants (i.e. prohibited medication)
- Known thrombocyte level lower than 150,000/Ķl
- Known hematocrit lower than 35%
- Known bleeding disorder
|- mec approval received||yes|
|- multicenter trial||no|
|- Type||Single arm|
|- planned startdate ||20-aug-2013|
|- planned closingdate||20-aug-2015|
|- Target number of participants||820|
|- Interventions||Diagnostic trial|
Every patient (700 in total) that is included undergoes the following:
Blood withdrawal 57 ml - hemostatic tests are performed.
Bleeding questionnaire (ISTH-BAT)
Undergoes surgery as planned, clinical endpoints (blood loss, use of blood products and mortality) will be measured.
Also active controls will be included (not yet MEC approved). 120 in total; they will undergo the same screening package as patients and the same clinical endpoints will be measured. The aim of this active control group is mainly to validate the screening package in the same base population.
A larger prospective control group will be followed only for clinical endpoints (not yet MEC approved)
|- Primary outcome||To evaluate the validity of a diagnostic screening package for bleeding tendency consisting of point-of-care hemostatic tests and the ISTH-BAT, compared to the golden standard an haematologist currently uses for diagnosing bleeding disorders.|
|- Secondary outcome||1. To develop a more efficient screening algorithm for patients with possible bleeding disorders.|
2. Describe differences in the usages of blood products and the hemoglobin drop per operatively between patients with bleeding symptoms and healthy controls (both preoperative patients).
|- Timepoints||Between visiting anaesthesiology department for preoperative screening and the operation (window of 2-6 weeks)|
|- Trial web site||N/A|
|- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIES||MSc, PhH Candidate Minka Vries|
|- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIES||MSc, PhH Candidate Minka Vries|
|- Sponsor/Initiator ||Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+)|
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
|Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum (MUMC+)|
|- Brief summary||Each year 15,000 patients are screened before surgery at the outpatient department of anesthesiology on bleeding tendency. A short bleeding questionnaire is being used to guide the anesthesiologist if a patient has a possible bleeding tendency or not: a negative questionnaire can safely be regarded as a true negative, but in the case of a positive questionnaire little guidance is at hand what to do next. Lengthy laboratory tests, which only test part of the coagulation cascade, are done, but give to little information on bleeding tendency. New point-of-care devices are faster and give a more overview of the coagulation cascade. Using these tests in a screening scenario has not been researched yet. A more elaborate questionnaire for bleeding tendency, in which a score can be computed, could possibly narrow down the false positives while maintaining the sensitivity from the short bleeding questionnaire now being used.|
The main object is to evaluate the validity of a diagnostic screening package for bleeding tendency consisting of point-of-care devices when compared with the gold standard for bleeding tendency diagnosis. Other objects which will be investigated are: the development of a more efficient screening algorithm by use of a bleeding risk score in patients who have one or more positive answers in the current short questionnaire and describing the differences in the usages of blood products, hemoglobin drop and morbidity/mortality between the patients that report bleeding symptoms and patients that do not
Countries of recruitment:
The Netherlands, MUMC
|- Main changes (audit trail)|
|- RECORD||12-jul-2013 - 24-jul-2013|