search  
 


Home

Who are we?

Why
register?


Signup for
registration


Online registration

Log in to register
your trial


Search a trial

NRT en CCMO

Contact

NEDERLANDS





MetaRegister
van CCT (UK)


ISRCTN-Register
van CCT (UK)


What is the best treatment for a fracture of the fifth metacarpal: Paris plaster versus compression bandage


- candidate number23599
- NTR NumberNTR5656
- ISRCTNISRCTN no longer applicable
- Date ISRCTN created
- date ISRCTN requested
- Date Registered NTR12-jan-2016
- Secondary IDsnWMO148 METC MCL
- Public TitleWhat is the best treatment for a fracture of the fifth metacarpal: Paris plaster versus compression bandage
- Scientific TitleWhat is the best treatment for subcapital metacarpal fifth fracture: paris plaster versus compression bandage
- ACRONYM
- hypothesisTreatment of a subcapital metacarpal fifth fracture with a compression bandage gives the same functional outcome a treatment with paris plaster
- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studiedHand function, Fracture
- Inclusion criteria- patients between 18-65 years
- presenting in the emergency department of the hospital in Leeuwarden or Heerenveen with a subcaptial metacarpal fifth fracture
- period 2-1-2016 till 30-7-2017
- Exclusion criteria- age > 65
- operative treatment
- repositions
- open fracture
- concommitant injury like tendon injury of a second fracture on the same extremity
- relapse fracture
- patiŽnts with a neuromusculair condition of which to expect decreased handfunction (CVA, MS, CTS, dupuytren).
- mec approval receivedyes
- multicenter trialyes
- randomisedno
- groupParallel
- Type2 or more arms, non-randomized
- Studytypeobservational
- planned startdate 2-jan-2016
- planned closingdate30-jul-2017
- Target number of participants72
- Interventionstreatment with paris plaster compared to compression bandage
- Primary outcomeHandfunction measured by a questionnaire
- Secondary outcome- time to return to work
- complaints of stiffness of pain during/after treament
- comfort of treatment
- overall patient satisfaction
- cosmetic aspect
- Timepoints18 months for patient inclusion and data collection
2 months data analyses
4 months writing article
- Trial web site
- statusplanned
- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIES J. Vulto
- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIES J. Vulto
- Sponsor/Initiator Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (MCL)
- Funding
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Wetenschapsfonds MCL, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- Publications
- Brief summary
- Main changes (audit trail)
- RECORD12-jan-2016 - 20-mrt-2016


  • Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar nederlands@trialregister.nl