|- candidate number||24158|
|- NTR Number||NTR5722|
|- ISRCTN||ISRCTN no longer applicable|
|- Date ISRCTN created|
|- date ISRCTN requested|
|- Date Registered NTR||30-mrt-2016|
|- Secondary IDs||16T36 |
|- Public Title||LIFT onderzoek|
|- Scientific Title||A randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. |
|- ACRONYM||LIFT (Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial)|
|- hypothesis||The hypothesis of the LIFT study is that TLIF is superior to PLIF in reducing disability in patients with single level spondylothesis and that TLIF is more cost-effective when compared to the PLIF procedure.|
|- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied||Lumbar disk, Spondylolisthesis|
|- Inclusion criteria||- Indication for TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) of PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) surgery.|
- Clinical mono uni-or bilateral lumbar radiculopathy or intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by a single level isthmic, degenerative or iatrogenic spondylolisthesis gr I, II or III according to Meyerding classification at level L3L4, L4L5 or L5S1.
- Age over 18 years.
- Single level spondylolisthesis with central or foraminal stenosis on MRI (or CT), of which the anatomical level is corresponding to the clinical syndrome.
- Psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this study protocol.
- Informed consent prior to this study.
|- Exclusion criteria||- Previous radiotherapy at the intended surgical level.|
- (Progressive) motor failure and/or anal sphincter disorders which urges instant intervention.
- Active infection.
- Immature bone (ongoing growth).
- Active malignancy.
- Symptomatic osteoporosis.
- Contra-indications for anaesthesia or surgery.
- Inadequate command of the Dutch language.
|- mec approval received||yes|
|- multicenter trial||yes|
|- Type||2 or more arms, randomized|
|- planned startdate ||1-sep-2016|
|- planned closingdate||1-sep-2020|
|- Target number of participants||144|
|- Interventions||TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) or PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) (1:1 randomization).|
|- Primary outcome||Reduction in disability measured by the change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and changes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) measured with EQ-5D-DL.|
|- Secondary outcome||Short Form (36) Health Survey, VAS back pain and leg pain, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), complications, productivity losses costs (iPCQ), medical costs (iMCQ).|
|- Timepoints||All primary and secondary outcomes will be measured at five fixed time points: pre-operatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.|
Except HADS, only pre-operatively, and complications, only post-operatively at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|- Trial web site||NA|
|- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIES||MD S.L. de Kunder|
|- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIES|| Henk van Santbrink|
|- Sponsor/Initiator ||Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Academisch fonds/Guy Peeters fonds|
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
|Academisch fonds/Guy Peeters fonds, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+)|
|- Brief summary||BACKGROUND
With a steep increase in the number of instrumented spinal fusion procedures, there is a need for comparative data to develop evidence based treatment recommendations. Currently, the available data on cost and clinical effectiveness of the two most frequently performed surgeries for lumbar spondylolisthesis, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is not sufficient. Therefore, current guidelines do not advise which is the most appropriate surgical treatment strategy for these patients. Non-randomized studies comparing TLIF and PLIF moreover suggest that TLIF is associated with fewer complications, less blood loss, shorter operative time and hospital duration. TLIF may therefore be more cost effective. The results of this study will provide knowledge on short- and longterm clinical and economical effects of TLIF and PLIF procedures, which will lead to recommendations for treating patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.|
Multicenter blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT; blinding for the patient and statistician, not for the clinician and researcher). A total of 144 patients over 18 years old with symptomatic single level lumbar degenerative, isthmic or iatrogenic spondylolisthesis whom are candidates for LIF (lumbar interbody fusion) surgery through a posterior approach will be randomly allocated to TLIF or PLIF. The study will consist of three parts: 1) a clinical effectiveness study, 2) a cost-effectiveness study, and 3) process evaluation.
The primary clinical outcome measure is: change in disablity measured with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and change in quality adjusted life years (QALY) measured with EQ-5D-5L. Secondary clinical outcome measures are: Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), complications, productivity related costs (iPCQ) and medical costs (iMCQ). Measurements will be carried out at five fixed time points (pre-operatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months).
It is hypothesized that TLIF, compared to PLIF, has similar clinical outcome or is possibly better in reducing disability. Moreover, direct medical costs are expected to be lower due to less surgical morbidity, shorter hospital stay and shorter surgical time. Indirect costs are assumed to be lower for TLIF as well, because we suspect less working days are lost. Currently, prospective data comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of both techniques are not available. Therefore, in clinical practice both techniques are used and the choice for technique is greatly based on surgeonís preference. The demand for spinal fusion surgery has risen steeply over the last ten years and is expected to increase even further in the near future. As a result the burden on society (and the working population) will increase. In case our hypothesis is confirmed, treatment guidelines will be adapted, and TLIF will be recommended as first choice surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Ultimately this will lead to reduction of (direct and indirect) costs and better clinical outcome for spondylolisthesis patients eligible for instrumented spinal surgery.
|- Main changes (audit trail)|
|- RECORD||30-mrt-2016 - 2-mei-2016|
- Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar firstname.lastname@example.org