search  
 


Home

Who are we?

Why
register?


Signup for
registration


Online registration

Log in to register
your trial


Search a trial

NRT en CCMO

Contact

NEDERLANDS





MetaRegister
van CCT (UK)


ISRCTN-Register
van CCT (UK)


Risk communication about alternative health promotion strategies


- candidate number24541
- NTR NumberNTR5952
- ISRCTNISRCTN no longer applicable
- Date ISRCTN created
- date ISRCTN requested
- Date Registered NTR30-jun-2016
- Secondary IDs16-N-84 
- Public TitleRisk communication about alternative health promotion strategies
- Scientific TitleRisk communication about alternative health promotion strategies
- ACRONYMRICALTS
- hypothesisAim: Our project aims to assess the effects of including second best options in risk communications that currently only contain best options, by studying two cases: smoking cessation versus e-cigarette use, and full versus partial vaccination. Objectives:
1. Identify the determinants of choices concerning best, second best and worst options and factors that may prevent counterproductive effects;
2. Determine the effects of risk communication about best and second best options on
a. primary outcomes: citizensí intentions towards the best, second best and worst strategy
b. secondary outcomes: citizensí knowledge and accuracy of perceived risks, attitudes, self-efficacy/confidence about the different options, and informed decision making including decreased decisional conflict, increased satisfaction with the decision, increased decision self-efficacy, and reduced proportion remaining undecided.
3. Develop and test a Risk Prevention Decision Aid that can be used by the RIVM for providing risk communication that includes second best options. This will ensure effective
- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studiedE-cigarettes, Immune status
- Inclusion criteriaNon smokers - between 13 and 17 years old
Smokers - older than 18
E-cigarette users - older than 18

parents of children between 0 and 4 years old that are over 18 - that use the national immunization program and that do not use the national immunization program.
- Exclusion criterianvt
- mec approval receivedyes
- multicenter trialno
- randomisedno
- group[default]
- Type[default]
- Studytypeobservational
- planned startdate 13-jun-2016
- planned closingdate1-sep-2017
- Target number of participants100
- Interventionsnvt
- Primary outcomenvt
- Secondary outcomenvt
- Timepointsnvt
- Trial web sitenvt
- statusopen: patient inclusion
- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIES Kim Romijnders
- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIES Kim Romijnders
- Sponsor/Initiator National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
- Funding
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM)
- Publicationsnvt
- Brief summaryGovernmental organizations usually only provide information on the best option to avoid or mitigate a specific risk, such as stop smoking or full vaccination. Many citizens do not follow this advice and do nothing, which is the worst option from a public health point of view. However, they may also seek alternative advices for second best options, such as using e-cigarettes or partial vaccination. Communication on alternative health options is currently not evidence based, and often performed by stakeholders with a vested interest. Including a second best option in health communications may increase public health and informed decision-making, but it may also result in counterproductive effects.
- Main changes (audit trail)
- RECORD30-jun-2016 - 23-aug-2016


  • Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar nederlands@trialregister.nl