search  
 


Home

Who are we?

Why
register?


Signup for
registration


Online registration

Log in to register
your trial


Search a trial

NRT en CCMO

Contact

NEDERLANDS





MetaRegister
van CCT (UK)


ISRCTN-Register
van CCT (UK)


Video-assisted Intubations in the Prehospital Setting (VIPS)


- candidate number25385
- NTR NumberNTR6174
- ISRCTNISRCTN no longer applicable
- Date ISRCTN created
- date ISRCTN requested
- Date Registered NTR10-okt-2016
- Secondary IDsMEC-2015-467 (METC Erasmus MC) 
- Public TitleVideo-assisted Intubations in the Prehospital Setting (VIPS)
- Scientific TitleVideo-assisted Intubations in the Prehospital Setting (VIPS)
- ACRONYMVIPS
- hypothesisWe expect that video-assisted intubation (video laryngoscopy) by ambulance nurses will have a higher success rate than intubation with a classical intubation device (direct laryngoscopy).
- Healt Condition(s) or Problem(s) studiedResuscitation, Intubation
- Inclusion criteria1. Patient requiring endotracheal intubation
2. GCS of 3 points, without suspected neurological injuries
3. Estimated age 18 years or older
- Exclusion criteria1. No CO2 production visible on capnogram, or no capnogram available
- mec approval receivedyes
- multicenter trialno
- randomisedno
- groupParallel
- Type2 or more arms, non-randomized
- Studytypeintervention
- planned startdate 1-jan-2016
- planned closingdate31-dec-2017
- Target number of participants500
- InterventionsVideolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy
- Primary outcomeFirst-time success
- Secondary outcome- Second-attempt success
- Time required for intubation
- Adverse events
- ROSC
- TimepointsOn-scene, immediately after intubation
- Trial web siteNone
- statusopen: patient inclusion
- CONTACT FOR PUBLIC QUERIESMD PhD M.H.J. Verhofstad
- CONTACT for SCIENTIFIC QUERIESMD PhD M.H.J. Verhofstad
- Sponsor/Initiator Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus MC, Trauma Research Unit department of Surgery, AmbulanceZorg Rotterdam Rijnmond
- Funding
(Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support)
None
- PublicationsNone yet; study is ongoing
- Brief summaryBACKGROUND
Literature shows that the rate of first-time success of emergency endotracheal intubation by ambulance nurses is highly variable; rates between 46 and 95% have been reported. Due to differences in device design, we hypothesize that the rate of first-time success can be improved when using videolaryngoscopy instead of direct laryngoscopy.

AIM
The primary aim of this prospective, observational study is to compare the rate of first-time success of intubation (by ambulance nurses) using videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy. Secondary aims are to assess the rate of second-attempt success, time required for intubation, rate of adverse events, and rate of ROSC after videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy, performed by ambulance nurses.

STUDY DESIGN
Observational study.

POPULATION
Patients requiring emergency endotracheal intubation.

INTERVENTION
Videolaryngoscopy

CONTROL
Direct laryngoscopy

ENDPOINTS
Primary outcome measure: first-time success.
Secondary outcome measures: second-attempt success, time required for intubation, adverse events, and ROSC.
Primary and secondary outcomes will be determined on-scene immediately after intubation.

RECRUITING COUNTRIES
The Netherlands
- Main changes (audit trail)
- RECORD10-okt-2016 - 19-feb-2017


  • Indien u gegevens wilt toevoegen of veranderen, kunt u een mail sturen naar nederlands@trialregister.nl